Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Time for honest, well-informed 'truthers' to stop self-censoring

My Twitter usage has been minimal the past few months. I go days without even taking so much as a glance. Using Twitter sparingly, admittedly, allows for a certain level of piece of mind. I've logged on and let loose from time to time, as I did last night, but that has become increasingly rare. Why? Have I not found some of the most tuned-in and "awake" individuals there? As unfortunate as it has now revealed itself to be, Twitter is indeed where I have found by far the most thinking personalities. So what exactly is it that has led me away from that "outlet," where similar ideas and higher-level thinking are just a touch of the icon away? Truth be told, it's a combination of things. Human nature dictates -- at least among the more tuned-in of us -- a level of disappointment and frustration that is damn near impossible to avoid. We all believe we're correct in our outlook, studies, ideologies, viewpoints, etc etc. The problem is, where many of us meet and share our experience, education and agreements on many extremely important matters, some choose to hit the brakes and develop a degree of satisfaction or complacency with their destination that, undoubtedly, has far exceeded what is to be expected from the average idiot. But that is not enough, and as I and a select few others have come to realize, once two, or three or twenty six steps forward have been taken, to stop dead in ones tracks is essentially taking steps backwards as events develop and dynamics evolve and change.

What is happening is obvious: Twitter itself has become not a means of sharing ideas and spreading information in the interest of neutralizing certain advantages the (Jewish) powers that be maintain over us, but instead a platform for well-meaning yet often half-hearted or misdirected individuals to establish a brand, so to speak. A place where individuals whose real life has shown them that their ideas -- however radical, truthful, or in some cases misguided they may be -- have no place in their daily lives, and Twitter becomes a means of not only speaking what cannot be spoken otherwise, but also a means to validate one's self on a level that transcends those "radical" ideas themselves, consequently building a following for that "brand," as substantiated as it may or may not be. In many cases, the truths brought to the surface are vital and far outweigh the shortcomings which accompany that brand. This, in itself, is hardly problematic. No one at all has all the answers or all the knowledge from which we can establish an accurate picture of the current state of affairs. It would be foolish to believe otherwise. Nevertheless, a grave problem remains, and it as persistent as the toxic ideologies that pervade public discourse from all angles and demographics -- from the Jewish-influenced party whores to the pseudo-alternative media. When all is said and done we arrive at the same place. I appreciate and value what I've learned and what has been brought to my attention as a result of my use of Twitter. But it's inadequate. The longer this intellectual inadequacy drags along, the more difficult it becomes to value certain information and revelations the way I once did, and the more difficult it becomes to believe that this "truth-seeking" crowd has maintained its honesty and drive to expand their horizons, which can only lead to growth and evolution of ideas, perspectives and deviation from what at one point or another seemed all but set in stone. That's just not the way life works -- especially when we're talking about real seekers of truth and answers. Stagnancy and complacency are quite literally a dead-end, at which point an individual is extremely vulnerable to shutting down intellectually and transforming into an ideologue who has built a wall around themselves and what they've settled on as qualifying as "as much as I can do." This devolution of the intellectual process is what has chased me away in large part; to say nothing of the self-defeating, counter-productive ripple effect this causes, affecting primarily curious newcomers to the 'truth' movement who, while only getting their feet wet, enter into an illusion of know-it-all simplicity and stunted growth when it comes to peeling off layers that are essential for us all to attack, yet remain largely untouched. There is undoubtedly a sense of gratification that comes with elevating ones awareness and knowledge most are blind to, but this gratification cannot, under any circumstances, represent a completion of this endeavor. Should it, one would be hard pressed to make an argument that we, as a "tuned-in" community, have made any steps forward at all. And so, we must always push harder, remain receptive, never disregard uncomfortable hypotheses, and most importantly, learn to be immune from stigma and fear of which has consequences with little to no practical impact on our lives. Did I grow as a human being in a profound way and learn certain facts that highlighted the deficiencies I now cannot help but be disgusted by, or has 'truther' Twitter devolved and perhaps succumb to social engineering they themselves wholeheartedly believe they're waging war against? It could be a combination of both.

As I said previously, no one possesses all the answers. I do not claim to know every detail of history or of the inner workings of the US establishment. There exist complexities none of us will ever know. Hell, this is why we never stop searching, digging and reading. However, there are certain irrefutable facts, buried in history and hidden in plain sight, whose importance cannot be understated or ignored. Facts which make up a piece of the puzzle ultimately leading to the best understanding we can hope to obtain. These pieces cannot be cast aside or overlooked if we're to have any chance of implicating those who make up the true source of the numerous evils taking place in the world; evils which are obscured in different ways and framed in a variety of ways so as to appeal to the disgruntled masses from all walks of life. The one and only way to bring together the disgruntled masses who seek to expose these forces, regardless of how each may picture them, is to peel away the layers, once and for all revealing the guilty parties who exercise unrivaled and unmatched control over the entire planet. History tells the story and current events validate that history. It's so obvious, in fact, when one makes a sincere effort in their observation and reflection, I find myself completely baffled that of the sizable crowd of "tuned-in" individuals, still such a small percentage have broken down that proverbial wall, where history and current events converge in a way that leaves so little doubt as to the direction our eyes and minds should be focused. For this entry I will shy somewhat from explicit references as best I can. After all, my real problem is not refusal to identify guilty parties when it is all but a foregone conclusion, but more so the striking unwillingness to personally become versed and confident enough to proclaim without fear what most already know.

I have read articles, books, scripture and a variety of other material, over the course of many years (even during my days of hypnosis by the dangling carrot of Communism) and everything of particular relevance I have absorbed has led me, almost a decade later, to a conclusion that sports documentation and a slew of other types of evidence, which together is as convincing, damning, verifiable and in-your-face obvious as anything I've ever taken the time to research. I have spent innumerable hours researching vaccines, geoengineering, and more topics than I care to even recite in the interest of time and continuity, and although many brave people have done great work in those areas, we are left with one conspiracy that supersedes all of that and more, and which threatens all of us, along with life on this earth as we know it. Astonishingly, for as many well-meaning and dedicated seekers of truth dig in and put in the time to uncover the very rotten roots from which nearly all chaos, death, misery, violence and suffering grow in this world, very few stand face to face with that ugly conclusion and proceed to raise their voice in opposition to this cancer infecting the world. For whatever reason -- be it laziness, fear or some sort of strategic maneuvering -- they stop short and set up camp on the "safe" side of the line drawn in the sand. Truth be told, the exact reason for this hesitation or calculation means very little. Personally, I find it inexcusable regardless.

Our time here is limited. That being said, the way I see it, if you've discovered and understand the root cause of global (and especially Western) deterioration of traditional values, freedom of speech, loss of privacy, massive and unnecessary loss of innocent life, a perpetual atmosphere of tension and fear, and so on and so forth, your reputation or image on a social media site, or even your own personal insecurities, are among the worst possible "justifications" for opting not to shine a bright light on the dark forces pushing us slowly but efficiently towards a hell on earth unimaginable to each and every one of us. The time for broken record Twitter lessons about the Clintons or Bush's, controlled opposition figures, the intelligence agencies and so forth, are over. If enough of us have the balls to expose this repugnant death cult for what is is, what it represents, what its responsible for over the past 2,000+ years and the havoc it wreaks to this very day; If all who have reservations for whatever reason ignored the pressure from social media, dove into history and this death cult's "holy" scriptures, and as a result went 100% of the way instead of 90%; If all of these well-meaning individuals ignored once and for all what an "ethnic Jew" consists of and shook their semantics distractions, prioritizing the well-being of humanity as a whole instead of a handful of confused little Tribe wannabes; If we all, as a unified voice against the worst form of tyranny, brutality, deviancy and discrimination in the history of mankind, come to terms with the fact that our enemy is but one, hidden in plain sight and plotting all kinds of malevolence against the entirety of the human race, perhaps wasting six, seven or nine hours a day beating a dead horse might just seem as if it's run its course and at the very least, the psychological paradigm can be altered. It would be a start.

So to return to the headline -- What the fuck is a truther? What is a truther if not someone whose journey for truth is continuous, absent any complacency or sentiment of "well, that's good enough, what's the point of taking the next step?" Such sentiment is absurd and shameful, defying literally everything we, as a group of tuned-in individuals, are supposed to represent and strive for. If you're satisfied with what you've learned I suspect Twitter followers or other less-than-honorable motives are taking precedence over whatever truth you're interested in obtaining. What are people thinking? I have a few guesses.

I'm no psychologist, but I do believe I have always possessed an ability to analyze and read people in that type of manner. Admittedly, reading people you've never met and only know through social media is tricky and anything by fool-proof. But at the same time, it's also not impossible, and human behavior and/or psychology traits can and do surface in a limited fashion through these means. This is especially true as it pertains to people you've been connected with for a long period of time. To be clear, it is not, here, nor has it ever been, my intention or goal to judge any one person of group of people's character as human beings. It's hardly about character in the most traditional sense; the world is full of good people who live out their entire existence without so much as giving a passing thought to the topics and subject matter us "burdened" individuals consume ourselves with. But there are reasons why many in this 'movement' go only 90% of the way and set up shop for the long haul, despite possessing all the ability in the world to continue their journey and venture into areas they've been led but from which they are being held back for whatever reason. In my humble opinion, there is a paradox of sorts in play. The seeker of truth, even the most exposed and pessimistic among us, at some point along the way, situate themselves within a comfort zone. This comfort zone offers a level of stability in the sense that, moving forward, as one absorbs new information, most everything brought into the fold can be neatly placed within an established set of (often very well informed and thoroughly researched) ideas and explanations. Often this approach will largely work from a factual standpoint, which in return reinforces the comfort zone. Unfortunately, the longer this approach is employed and the higher the volume of new information absorbed, the more the flaws begin to show and the cracks in the wall start spreading. Does this comfort zone, so to speak, represent a facet of the greater deterioration of public consciousness as a whole? I wouldn't go that far; as I type this many names and  individuals both on twitter and even in real life fly through my head, and these individuals are by and large way, way ahead of the curve.

Another explanation for the apparent unwillingness of some of the brightest, tuned-in among us to make the final leap and give full effort to putting the puzzle pieces in their proper places, is specializing. There is nothing inherently wrong with specializing, and in fact all of us who have stepped outside the matrix do this to some extent. Certain subject matter and areas of study appeal to us in more personal ways than they would the next guy. For example, in my case, I have made a point of emphasizing the subject of vaccines in my decade of being "unplugged." More so in the past few years as I raise a small child. It would be a mistake and almost certainly an egregiously misguided assumption to assume that, just because an individual is not especially vocal or overly informed on the subject of vaccines, that they still don't have a reasonable and likely accurate stance on the matter. Specializing can be a beautiful thing. There are peers of mine on twitter who are far more informed than myself on many things; people I know I could approach with questions and receive informed, articulate answers I personally don't have. As a group of individuals living outside the matrix, we need specialization -- it is an essential building block in the growth process. However (and this is a big-time however),  when specializing entails erecting a wall or boundary to operate behind at all times and under all circumstances, this is an extremely problematic situation. It is this more than anything, I believe, that is present where it counts. What purpose this barrier ultimately serves is lost on me and surely varies from person to person. But in any case, aside from aiding in the disguising and obscuring of the hidden hand in the most serious of matters (9/11 and other false flag attacks, for example), this mode of operation on the part of some of the brightest and most well-informed individuals sets a dangerous precedent for those who will "join our ranks" at some point in the future. In the United States, we are -- for now -- fortunate enough to enjoy a level of freedom of speech, with full-blown thought crimes not yet a real concern. While we still enjoy this relative freedom, it must be taken advantage of whenever and however possible.

In the interest of full disclosure and honesty, it's only right that I reveal my main inspiration for this entry. When we speak of the 9/11 false flag, the JFK assassination, the Charlie Hebdo "attack," the more recent Paris "attack," the apartheid state of "Israel" with its crimes against humanity, and the Jewish Israeli influence (stranglehold or occupation would actually be far more accurate a description) within the United States government, just to name a quick few, speaking of these matters in a watered-down, sugarcoated, or misleading (deliberate or unintentional) way is to contribute to the (Jewish) powers-that-be's ability to continue their terrorist operations unchecked and unpunished.

There will undoubtedly be plenty of individuals who find themselves in disagreement with me here. Were that not the case, the thought of writing this would never have crossed my mind in the first place. That said, simply implicating the Mossad in various false flags or assassinations; simply blaming "Israel" for the 9/11 attacks; merely howling with the crowd day in and day out about the barbaric treatment of the Palestinians and ever expanding illegal borders of the Zionist project -- All of this "activism" falls short. It's no secret at this point that Israelis have embedded themselves into every facet of American society; government, finance, banking, media, pro sports, you name it. No longer does it suffice to merely call attention to this fact alone. There exists a common theme among all the aforementioned topics and among far too many more to even name. This common theme is not new, but in fact ancient, quite literally. This common theme, ever-present the world over and nearly everywhere these types of problems manifest themselves, from false flags to mass immigration, to foreign policy decisions beneficial in no discernible fashion to the nation implementing them, to the needless and cruel wars that follow those decisions, to the global monetary ponzi scheme bleeding the general population dry, and just about everything in between -- from A to Z, East to West, pole to pole -- the common, reoccurring theme is almost never absent.

This ever-present them, this ever-present problem, is a Jewish one. Not a Zionist one. Zionism isn't a Zionist problem, it is a Jewish problem. The occupation of Palestine, and of America, the widespread false flag attacks, the Mossad's dirty deeds, the house-of-cards financial racket we call the "global economy" -- None of these are Zionist problems, they are decidedly Jewish problems. By no means have I laid out anything close to the full extent of Jewish problems plaguing the world, and I have already written fairly extensively on the havoc they're wreaking on the planet. The purpose of this piece is not to outline and detail the ways in which Jews are slowly turning the planet into a living hell (although that is precisely what they have undertaken), but to voice my frustration with the hordes of sharp, well-informed, well-intentioned truth-seeking individuals who cannot in their analysis bring themselves to openly and without reservation lay the blame at the feet of its rightful owners. Blaming Zionism for this and that requires no courage. I would go as far as saying that being vocally "Anti-Zionist" in this day and age is trendy and incessantly celebrated. Why? It's a perpetuation of the cycle which allows Jewish crimes against humanity to persist full steam ahead, while all the attention is paid to the Zionist movement and its geographical base of primary operations, with the root cause of the Zionist movement and state at no point in time being invoked or even given a passing thought.

The fact of the matter is, one does not necessarily have to be of the opinion that all Jews (however they or you choose to define that word) are inherently evil or in some way "bad" to rightfully acknowledge and call attention to the fact that these examples and many, many others are indeed Jewish problems. It does not actually require a sweeping generalization of any kind to call Jewish crimes, Jewish crimes. By no means must one harbor "racist" or "anti-Semitic" sentiments in order to properly and honestly identify the culprit or culprits as Jewish if they are, in fact, Jewish. To take this even further, if a group of people has an established and extensive record of crimes and tendencies which are, for all intents and purposes, exclusive to them as a group, gang, organization, faction or what have you, why in the hell would anyone deliberately decline to identify them as such? To illustrate the point with as straight-forward an approach as possible, ask yourself: To accurately identify said group, does that necessitate an indictment of an entire demographic, a portion of which may be devoid of those tendencies? Can the generalization be made? Certainly. Is it required? Not at all. Does pointing out the fact that Jonathon Pollard is a Jew imply all Jews are Jonathon Pollards? The Jewish propensity for devious behavior and extreme ideas is not simply a prejudiced pre-conceived notion with no basis in fact. That propensity for such behavior and ideas is a phenomenon established by voluminous documentation and thousands of years of history. Yet still, if you are a firm believer in exceptions to that rule, is it a factual misrepresentation of some sort to identify the guilty party accordingly?

The objective here is not to establish whether or not Jews as a group are this or that, or to what extent they deserve blame for any given set of circumstances. The objective I brought into this piece was to call attention to the miserable fact that many or most of the sharpest, highly-informed matrix exiles on twitter routinely go out of their way to avoid implicating Jews, specifically, in a given situation or crime, even when it is plainly obvious the culpability is theirs and they know damn well that's the case. It's a bad look for an otherwise sharp individual who's leaps and bounds ahead of his/her peers, when they submissively allow their speech to be dictated by people and entities who deserve not a shred of respect, made especially more humiliating by the fact that no real consequences of any kind are a part of the equation. If you are fully aware it was Jews who were behind a horrific crime, and you don't harbor hostilities against Jews as a whole, there is no logical or justifiable reason to consciously circumvent usage of the word. I might suggest, if there is a genuine fear in play in terms of using the word under any circumstances, perhaps a thoughtful reconsideration of the prevalence of the 'exception' is in order. But I digress there.

In the bigger picture, self-censoring of this magnitude is indicative of either intense insecurity, questionable candor, or a paralyzing fear that can only be attributed to the very group and dynamic the individual refrains from mentioning. What these poor souls evidently fail to understand is that this self-imposed speech restriction is exactly what allows the Zionist movement and state to function as it does. It is this ingrained notion of thought crime which continues to strengthen the Jewish-controlled establishment with all of its injustices and deterioration of our quality of life, and really perpetuates everything the individual seeks to expose and bring an end to. A vicious cycle, and counter-productive at best. I cannot claim with any honesty that I have hope in the possibility of our society and way of life ever changing for the better. It is far more likely it will not, but will only continue to get worse. What I can confidently say, however, is that until self-styled truth-seekers who for all intents and purposes have good heads on their shoulders, overcome their penchant for self-censorship within a context of unparalleled importance, the downward spiral will pick up speed, the little bit of freedom we still enjoy will increasingly erode, and the power and control wielded by the (Jewish-controlled) establishment will expand and spread in an aggressive way. If we stand any chance of at least slowing this process down and securing some semblance of a normal life for our children and beyond, those people and entities responsible for annihilating quality of life the world over and bringing inconceivable death and suffering to millions upon millions of people, the guilty parties must be honestly, enthusiastically and relentlessly exposed, with no regard for ADL-type intimidation tactics. There can be no hiding behind slogans and "safe" terms, no using Zionism or the "state" of Israel as a means to obscure or downplay the larger and much more far-reaching sickness that spawned the demon child that established statehood on top of Palestine. Israel does not operate under a totally different set of rules (none whatsoever) than the rest of the world due simply to the fact that the United States "protects" them. Israel's unique ability to play by its own rules is not some spontaneous phenomenon where Zionism all of a sudden, and for no apparent reason, assumed the role of Supreme Commander of the World without so much as a whimper from the international community. The Zionist regime operates as it does for the same reasons tuned-in, bright people are scared to death of uttering the word Jew. Jewish criminals are Jewish criminals. Period. Jewish supremacy, power, influence etc are just that -- Jewish. Israel was and is a product of Jewish power,  it was not a self-germinating and self-sustaining entity who in a mere 70 years managed to inject its influence and operatives into almost every country on the planet as some rogue, independently-inspired Frankenstate. 

If the Zionist regime was indeed where the real problems begin and end, we would not be at liberty to say so without severe repercussions, just as it would be the Z word carrying so much dread and provoking barrages of vitriolic retaliation from every direction. If this state of affairs is not loudly called for exactly what it is, the beast will grow stronger. If honest, well-informed individuals cannot muster the courage to use the word Jew in any context, no matter how appropriate or relatively harmless its usage, any time and effort invested in pulling people out of the matrix they're living in is essentially wasted time and effort. It's one thing to be well-informed, it's another to use that knowledge to challenge such unwritten rules of intimidation and coercion. Refusing to defy that intimidation and passively surrendering your speech rights will assure the state of decline builds steam, culminating in total loss of that right to free speech and thought-crimes as a reality, enforced not by twitter trolls but by the courts.


  1. Thank you, sir, for identifying this problem. I identify as one of the truthers who has assiduously researched an unbelievably grand number of topics for a very long time. Included are raw expositions of the teachings and acts of the Jews and the obvious evidence of their continuing programs of control and subversion. I value your piece very much as it puts its finger directly on the problem with myself with which I feel uncomfortable every day: that I desist from using the word Jew or Jewish, that even because of two Jewish Facebook friends I self-censure myself to a remarkable and arguably shameful extent. You have inspired me to find a way to combine my knowledge (including religious/metaphysical studies) and creativity to try to not only overcome this but lend whatever tiny (or not) hand to human emancipation from these twisted atavistic fanatic derangements regarding 'God' etc in this problematic so-called monotheistic tradition. I'm not sure how, but am glad to feel a connection with you in awareness of this dilemma. Many thanks. - Giov