It has been close to a decade since I unplugged from the current of mainstream news story-telling, unrelenting propaganda and the entirely manufactured state of things most have been brainwashed into perceiving as reality. In that time I’ve developed a pretty robust level of discernment when it comes to wading through the oceans of disinformation and spotting the characters who peddle it. Senior editor of the alternative news website ‘Veterans Today’ Gordon Duff is an individual who has always aroused a great deal of suspicion in me. Though I could never really put my finger on what exactly it was that made me uneasy, I nevertheless always knew something was “off.” Without question, his publication has offered a great deal of extremely valuable information. His contributions, however, have always stood out to me as something out of the ordinary from not only the other contributors to his site, but in contrast to all other respectable and well-informed independent researchers and journalists I’ve become familiar with. For starters, his writing has a rather hyperbolic and sensationalist tone to it, somewhat along the lines of what is displayed by notorious Zionist shill and agent provocateur Alex ‘Stratfor’ Jones. Duff is more eloquent and composed in his delivery, while at the same time he is also inexplicably vague and ambiguous in much of what he puts forward. His writing can be qualified more as semi-coherent rambling than investigation. I’m inclined to believe this is not by chance, but rather because Mr. Duff (almost certainly not his real name) is not who he says he is.
Before citing some examples of Duff’s questionable background and dubious claims, I want to call attention to an article of his published in the online publication New Eastern Outlook, of which his VT is a partner. I would like to go through and highlight the many excerpts which reinforce my suspicion about this man, and why they do so. The aforementioned article is titled ‘Understanding Manufactured Dissent In America.’ The title in itself – a very common theme in Duff’s pieces – made putting this post together a no-brainer. Duff begins by throwing out a few recent economic developments in the US, resulting in – as he makes no attempt to clarify just how – “rising wages,” with absolutely no context given for this “rise,” or who exactly this has affected. It matters none, however, since this opening tidbit has very little, if anything, to do with the theme of his article. He proceeds, in typical fashion, to jump around in his subject matter and create a convoluted collection of apologetics for the Democratic party, references to martial law and gun control, and projection in regards to controlled opposition. A few curious statements he makes are:
“So, let’s talk about martial law. For those who really know American politics, the idea of a Democratic president being authoritarian is funny. There is nothing totalitarian about Democrats, in fact there is nothing even “organized” about the Democrats. They fight among each other so much, no two have ever agreed on anything.”
First, to make a distinction between the Republican and Democratic parties in such a way as to suggest the latter being authoritarian in nature is “funny,” whether in contrast to their Republican counterparts or at all, is bizarre to say the absolute least. It’d be difficult to make a case that the entire American political establishment itself is anything but authoritarian, among other reasons such an assertion is head-scratching. That aside, what it comes off as in this context is a subtle endorsement of the Democratic party, and /or an attempt to de-legitimize entirely people’s concern over an increasingly militarized society and ever-more-persistent calls for gun confiscation. Both of which, by the way, are anything but unfounded when you consider the false flag terror attacks and outright fake mass shootings that have grown increasingly more frequent. It’s worth noting, Duff himself has called many of these hoaxes and psychological operations for exactly what they are. So what gives?
He goes on:
“You see, the funny thing is the Democratic Party tends to stand for reform, civil rights, due process, free elections, environmental protections, quality education, health care and limitations on the privilege and power of those who have looted America.”
They do? This is news to me.
Perhaps puffing his chest, he states:
"As to the mechanisms of control in the US, few remotely understand any of it…"
I’m beginning to wonder if he knows a whole lot more than he’s willing to admit, and this statement is his way of rubbing in the faces of his readers what team he is actually playing for, without actually saying as much.
This is immediately followed by:
"America is highly decentralized as to political control."
This can be interpreted any number of ways. It’s a vague statement with context that doesn’t bring any real clarification to the claim. What’s interesting, though, is one way in which government authority has certainly been “decentralized” is through the infiltration and occupation by agents of Israel and the Mossad. And by decentralized, of course, we mean usurped and rendered completely opaque. For someone who continuously rails about Zionists, it’s odd to find no mention of Israel in this context.
The remainder of the “article” persists in its apologetics and borderline praise of president Obama, portraying him as merely a victim of Bush’s precedents and absolving him of any responsibility for the reign of terror he has overseen and even intensified, both overseas and domestically. For reasons unclear, he feels compelled to bring the subject of FEMA into the foray, stating:
"…thus the lunatic fringe talking about FEMA camps, which do not exist. However, they could exist but if they did, they would have been put there by Bush, not Obama…"
Every evil that currently exists in the US is a creation of right-wing entities, with Obama and his Democratic constituents merely standing helplessly on the sidelines. (And for the record, FEMA camps absolutely do exist, though they aren’t termed as such.)
One last excerpt I find very peculiar, before I touch on Duff’s shady background, is this:
"However, the Democratic Party is guilty of pandering to certain “urban elites” who advocate gun control. Their position is a rational one, people probably shouldn’t be able to own better weapons than the military but it is too late to do anything about it."
It is perplexing to me how someone like Duff can consider pandering to urban elites who want to disarm the public as a rational position. Who is this man, really? What is his real agenda? Furthermore, it is evident he harbors not only an unhealthy sympathy with a military industrial complex responsible for the mass murder of millions and millions of people (he was a marine, after all, though the veracity of "combat" veteran claim has not been without scrutiny), but also a certain level of contempt for the public at large. This is a revealing statement on his part which should call into question his true motives.
Duff's interesting background
Duff once admitted that as much as 40% of the information he writes is false, using as justification the notion that he'd be killed by TPTB if he simply told the whole truth. This open admission is absolutely astonishing coming from someone who writes about the subject matter he does and someone who has amassed the following he has among the 'truth-seeking' crowd. Taken at face value, it is nothing less than an admission to being a purveyor of disinformation; an acknowledgement that he possesses information he cannot or will not disclose. But it must be asked, why make such an admission in the first place? Is the notion that he'd be murdered if this were not the case a poorly-formulated tactic of building credibility, or is there a much more calculated reason? Perhaps this admission is in fact 100% true, only his perceived "fear" and "speculation" are in reality part of his job description as dictated by his handlers. If the latter is the case, it certainly doesn't pose any kind of risk to him or any entity Duff seemingly targets. The incident is a bizarre spectacle that only adds to the confusion and mystery surrounding this figure.
Something very few, if any of Duff's readers are aware of (or care to think twice about) is he belongs to an organization called Adamus Defense Group (ADG), based in Switzerland. Duff himself describes this organization as such: